Burrus v. Elevance Health, Inc. et al
| Kikishia Burrus |
| Elevance Health, Inc., The Elevance Companies, Inc. and Anthem Companies, Inc., The |
| 3:2022cv05297 |
| September 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| William H Orrick |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MOTION to Change Venue filed by Elevance Health, Inc., The Elevance Companies, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 12/21/2022 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick. Responses due by 11/18/2022. Replies due by 11/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael Weil, #2 Declaration of Yaasmeen Rayford, #3 Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Proposed Order regarding Motion to Transfer Venue, #5 Proposed Order regarding RJN)(Weil, Michael) (Filed on 11/4/2022)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE by Elevance Health, Inc. of Pendency of Other Action [L.R. 3-13] (Weil, Michael) (Filed on 10/4/2022)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE by Kikishia Burrus PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER (Patino, Jose) (Filed on 9/30/2022)
|
|
Filing 10
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Elevance Health, Inc., The Elevance Companies, Inc. for Defendants' Notice to State Court and Plaintiff of Removal of Action (9/19/22) and Notice of Case Assignment (Dkt 3) and other case-initiating papers (9/19/22) (Cruz, Anahi) (Filed on 9/28/2022)
|
|
Filing 9
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER - Case Management Conference set for 12/13/2022 02:00 PM via Videoconference. Case Management Statement due by 12/6/2022. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/23/2022. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2022)
|
|
Filing 8
Case reassigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen no longer assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 9/21/2022 (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2022)
|
|
Filing 7
This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #https://cand.uscourts.gov/notices/northern-district-extends-caseload-rebalancing-pilot-program/. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2022)
|
|
Filing 6
CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2022)
|
|
Filing 5
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Kikishia Burrus.. (Patino, Jose) (Filed on 9/20/2022)
|
|
Filing 4
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 12/13/20 22. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/20/2022 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2022)
|
|
Filing 1
ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) byElevance Health, Inc., The Elevance Companies, Inc.. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2022)
|
|
Filing 3
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/30/2022. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2022)
|
|
Filing 2
Certificate of Interested Entities by Elevance Health, Inc., The Elevance Companies, Inc. (Weil, Michael) (Filed on 9/16/2022)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. Their case number is 22CV402114. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17543568). Filed byThe Elevance Companies, Inc., Elevance Health, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Yaasmeen Rayford, #3 Declaration of Michael Weil)(Weil, Michael) (Filed on 9/16/2022)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
