Warwick v. University of the Pacific et al
| Joanne Warwick |
| University of the Pacific, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Patricia Miller and David Romero |
| 4:2008cv03904 |
| August 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| San Francisco |
| Claudia Wilken |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
253
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 247 RULE 60 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO OPPOSE COSTS. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2012)
|
|
Filing
244
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING 224 PLAINTIFF'S RULE 60 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2011)
|
|
Filing
220
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 219 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Request for Permission to E-File. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2011)
|
|
Filing
215
ORDER by Judge Wilken denying 191 Motion to Excuse Costs (cwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2010)
|
|
Filing
190
ORDER re 180 Granting Notice of Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 8/11/2010. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2010)
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 127 Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting 128 Motion for Summary Judgment (cwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2010)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman denying 100 Motion to Compel (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2010)
|
|
Filing
95
THIRD DISCOVERY ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 2/16/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2010)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER re 84 granting Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 2/10/11. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2010)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting 79 Motion to Compel (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2009)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER SCHEDULING TELEPHONIC DISCOVERY DISPUTE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 11/20/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2009)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER EXCUSING PERSONAL ATTENDANCE AT ENE. Signed by Judge Wayne D. Brazil on 8/31/2009. (wdblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2009)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER re 75 GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND ENE. Signed by Judge CLAUDIA WILKEN on 8/19/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2009)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER re 52 GRANTING STIPULATION re: Fourth Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge CLAUDIA WILKEN on 4/17/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2009)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER re 32 granting STIPULATION Extending Leave to file and serve a third amended complaint. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/10/08. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2008)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken granting 2 Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted filed by University of the Pacific; granting 11 Motion to Dismiss [FRCP Rule 12(b)(6)] filed by California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation; granting 14 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Verified Complaint and denying as moot Motion for More Definite Statement [FRCP 12(b)(6) and 12(e) filed by Patricia Miller (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2008)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER re 25 granting STIPULATION selecting Early Neutral Evaluation. Case referred to early neutral evaluation.. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/21/08. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
