Behjou v. Bank of America Group Benefits Program et al
| Omid Behjou |
| Bank of America Group Benefits Program, Bank of America Home Loan Corporation and Bank of America Corporate Benefits Committee |
| 4:2010cv03982 |
| September 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 77 Motion to Vacate PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2012)
|
|
Filing
76
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Each side shall pay its/his own attorneys' fees and costs re 74 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 8/9/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2012) Modified on 8/14/2012 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 53 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 58 Motion for Summary Judgment (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2012)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 53 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment, 58 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing set for 4/24/2012 01:00 PM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/30/12. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2012)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 12 Motion to Dismiss (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
