Clerkin et al v. Mylife.com Inc. et al
| John Clerkin and Veronica Mendez |
| Mylife.com Inc., Jeffrey Tinsley, Rachel Glaser, W. Dwight Gorall, Armen Avedissian, Michael Soh, Sharyn Eles and Oak Investment Partners |
| 4:2011cv00527 |
| February 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Claudia Wilken |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
ORDER re 147 Joint Discovery Letter Brief filed by Mylife.com Inc., Veronica Mendez, John Clerkin. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 10/04/2012. (nclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2012)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER Granting 141 STIPULATION For a Revision to Document Production Schedule and Setting Forth Class Certification Briefing Schedule Pursuant to the Court's May 4, 2012 Order. Motions due by 9/28/2012. Response/Cross Motions due by 11/9/2012 .Replies due by 12/14/2012. Replies due by 12/28/2012. Motion Hearing set for 1/17/2013 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken.Case Management Statement due by 1/10/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/17/2013 02:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/8/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2012)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER GRANTING 110 MOTION TO WITHDRAW. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/2/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2012)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER DENYING 108 MOTION TO DISQUALIFY, TAKING 110 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO WITHDRAW UNDER SUBMISSION, AND VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/28/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2012)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 112 MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION. Set/Reset Deadlines as to Motions due by 6/11/2012. Cross Motions due by 8/13/2012. Responses due by 8/13/2012. Replies due by 10/15/2012. Replies due by 10/22/2012. Case Management Statement due by 11/8/2012. Motion Hearing set for 11/15/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/15/2012 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/14/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2012)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER RE: 95 . The motion will be determined based on the papers. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 2/1/12. (nclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2012)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE for Discovery purposesre 95 MOTION to Compel. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/12/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2012)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER Granting Plaintiffs' 91 MOTION to Enlarge Time Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3. Motions due by 4/11/2012. Responses due by 6/10/2012. Replies due by 8/9/2012. Motion Hearing set for 9/13/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Signed by Judge Claidia Wilken on 1/5/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2012)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken ORDER DENYING 84 MOTION TO CERTIFY FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2011)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT OAK INVESTMENT PARTNERS 69 MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING DEFENDANTS JOINT 70 MOTION TO DISMISS AND 73 MOTION TO STRIKE. Responses due by 3/15/2012. Replies due by 5/17/2012. Replies due by 5/24/2012. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 8/29/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2011)
|
|
Filing
80
AMENDED ORDER re 79 GRANTING DEFENDANT GORALLS RULE 12(B)(2) 39 MOTION TO DISMISS, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS RULE 12(B)(6) 42 MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS 47 MOTION TO APPOINT INTERIM CLASS COUNSEL. **CASE NO. CORRECTED ON PAGE 18 IS THE ONLY CHANGE (HIGHLIGHTED ON ORDER)**. ***CONSOLIDATING CASES C-11-2353-CW and C-11-3073-CW. ALL FUTURE FILING SHALL BE FILED IN THIS CASE C-11-527-CW*** Signed by Judge CLAUDIA WILKEN on 8/16/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2011) Modified on 8/16/2011 (cp, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING DEFENDANT GORALLS RULE 12(B)(2) 39 MOTION TO DISMISS, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS RULE 12(B)(6) 42 MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS 47 MOTION TO APPOINT INTERIM CLASS COUNSEL. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2011)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 8/2/2011. (cwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2011)
|
|
Filing
76
AMENDED ORDER RELATING CASES AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER in case 4:11-cv-00527-CW and 3:11-cv-3073-MEJ Re (75 in 4:11-cv-00527-CW, 14 in 4:11-cv-02353-CW). Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 8/1/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2011)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER RELATING CASES AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER in case 4:11-cv-00527-CW and 3:11-cv-3073-MEJ. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/29/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2011)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER DENYING 60 Stipulation to Change the Time of the June 9, 2011 Hearing From 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/27/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2011)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER Granting 33 Stipulation EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING BY ONE WEEK UNTIL APRIL 13, 2011. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/5/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2011)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS 25 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
