Synnex Corporation v. Wattles
Synnex Corporation |
Mark J. Wattles |
New Age Electronics, Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Company |
Mark J. Wattles |
4:2011cv01496 |
March 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Laurel Beeler |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 147 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/28/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2012) |
Filing 142 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 124 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2012) |
Filing 130 ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 124 MOTION for Summary Judgment CORRECTED VERSION - EXHIBITS 1-10 ARE INCLUDED IN DKT 107. Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing is CONTINUED to 10/30/2012 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/15/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2012) |
Filing 125 ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO COMPLY WITH STANDING ORDER AND LOCAL RULES REGARDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 107 , 124 ; Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment is continued to October 16, 2012. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/3/2012. (cp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2012) Modified on 10/3/2012 (cp, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 118 ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 107 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 9/13/2012. Replies due by 9/20/2012. Motion Hearing set for 10/9/2012 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/29/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2012) |
Filing 109 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Order to Show Cause Hearing set for Friday, 8/31/2012 09:01 AM. Show Cause Response due by 8/24/2012.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/21/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2012) |
Filing 92 CONSENT ORDER re 91 MOTION to Substitute Attorney filed by Mark J. Wattles. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/11/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2012) |
Filing 87 CONSENT ORDER RE SUBSTUTION OF ATTORNEY. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/11/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2012) |
Filing 65 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE RE-SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 3/30/2012 02:00 PM. Show Cause Response due by 3/23/2012. Case Management Conference set for 3/30/2012 02:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/16/2012. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2012) |
Filing 57 ORDER by Judge Hamilton Granting 49 Motion to Dismiss Third Party Complaint and Vacating Hearing Date (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2012) |
Filing 46 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER re 45 Case Management Conference - Initial. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/15/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2011) |
Filing 34 STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS (MEDIATION ) re 32 Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Mediation filed by Synnex Corporation, Case referred to mediation. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/22/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2011) |
Filing 20 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 8/4/2011. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/11/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/19/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.