Tidwell v. U.S. Department of Labor Office of Workers' Compensation Program et al
| Arthur R. Tidwell |
| Department of Navy Naval FAC ENG CMD-Stations & Bases HRO-Navy Region Southwest, U.S. Department of Labor Office of Workers' Compensation Program and Alexis Lara |
| 4:2011cv06393 |
| December 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Diego |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Federal Employers Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 25 Motion to Dismiss; granting 25 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2012)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Case Management Statement due by 9/20/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 9/27/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland.Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/15/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2012)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 6/6/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/6/2012: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ig, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER. Case Management Statement due by 4/18/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/25/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 3/22/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
