Dimond Internet Services, LLC v. County of Alameda

Plaintiff: Dimond Internet Services, LLC
Defendant: County of Alameda
Case Number: 4:2013cv01893
Filed: April 25, 2013
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Phyllis J. Hamilton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 27, 2013 14 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGE ILLSTON'S STANDING ORDER (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2013)
May 22, 2013 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANT'S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE re 5 Stipulation filed by County of Alameda. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/22/13. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2013)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dimond Internet Services, LLC v. County of Alameda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dimond Internet Services, LLC
Represented By: Herman Clyde Long
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Alameda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.