Rosset et al v. Hunter Engineering Company et al
Plaintiff: Joe Niccum, Thomas White and Jay Rosset
Defendant: Hunter Engineering Company and Bill Keyes
Case Number: 4:2014cv01701
Filed: April 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER (1) REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND AND (2) DIRECTING THE PARTIES TO PROVIDE FURTHER BRIEFING REGARDING DEFENDANTS' ERISA COMPLETE PREEMPTION GROUND FOR REMOVAL. The court rejects Plaintiffs' arguments that Defendants& #039; removal of the action was procedurally defective, accepts their argument that Mr. Keyes was not fraudulent joined, and directs the parties to provide further briefing regarding Defendants' ERISA complete preemption ground for removal. No later than 5:00 p.m. PDT on Thursday, July 24, 2014, Defendants shall file a 5-page brief addressing this issue. Then, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 31, 2014, Plaintiff may file a 5-page brief in response. The court then will review the briefs and take the matter under submission. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/17/2014. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosset et al v. Hunter Engineering Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hunter Engineering Company
Represented By: Natalie Ikhlassi
Represented By: Helen Byungson Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bill Keyes
Represented By: Natalie Ikhlassi
Represented By: Helen Byungson Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Niccum
Represented By: Christopher D. Banys
Represented By: Jennifer Lu Gilbert
Represented By: Richard Cheng-hong Lin
Represented By: Eric J. Sidebotham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas White
Represented By: Christopher D. Banys
Represented By: Jennifer Lu Gilbert
Represented By: Richard Cheng-hong Lin
Represented By: Eric J. Sidebotham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jay Rosset
Represented By: Jennifer Lu Gilbert
Represented By: Christopher D. Banys
Represented By: Richard Cheng-hong Lin
Represented By: Eric J. Sidebotham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?