Crider et al v. Pacific Acquisitions & Associates, LLC
| Ronnique Crider and Raymond Dale Crider |
| Pacific Acquisitions & Associates, LLC |
| 4:2014cv03498 |
| August 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Nathanael M. Cousins |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO RONNIQUE CRIDER; DENYING MOTION AS TO RAYMOND CRIDER. Re: Dkt. No. 28 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2015)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER REQUESTING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. No. 28 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 10/2/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2015)
|
|
Filing
24
SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court VACATES the trial date and schedule. Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 9/2/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom D, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/24/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2015)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE MOTION TO CONTINUE 7 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/7/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 1/5/2015. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 10/29/2014. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
