Dixson v. Beard
Petitioner: Demetrois Terrell Dixson
Respondent: Jeffrey Beard
Case Number: 4:2014cv05069
Filed: November 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: PSLC RMH
Presiding Judge: Claudia Wilken
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Wilken granting 14 Motion to Dismiss; denying 21 Motion for Evidentiary Hearing.(cwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2016)
September 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED AS NEXT FRIEND by Judge Claudia Wilken denying 16 Motion. (CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ATTACHED) (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2015)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dixson v. Beard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Demetrois Terrell Dixson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeffrey Beard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?