Chiu v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
| Bosco Wai-Choy Chiu |
| NBS Default Services, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 4:2014cv05261 |
| December 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Elizabeth D. Laporte |
| Foreclosure |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant Wells Fargo Bank's motion to dismiss 20 with partial leave to amend and denying as moot Plaintiff's motion to strike 29 by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Any amended complaint shall be filed no later than April 2, 2015. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2015)
|
|
Filing
39
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER for Jury Trial by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2015)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER Granting Stipulation for Order to Shorten Time for Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike NBS Default Services, LLC's Joinder to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: granting 33 Stipulation. The hearing is now set for 3/3/2015 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco.(shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2015)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 12/12/2014. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
