Rund v. Banyan Water, Inc. et al
| Shannon Rund |
| Banyan Water, Inc. and Water Steward, Inc. |
| 4:2015cv02043 |
| May 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Sonoma |
| Kandis A. Westmore |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER For Dismissal Without Prejudice filed by Water Steward, Inc., Shannon Rund, Banyan Water, Inc., ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 2/18/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2016)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER extending deadline to complete mediation filed by Water Steward, Inc., Shannon Rund, Banyan Water, Inc. Deadline to complete mediation is extended to 11/20/2015. Case Management Conference is continued to 12/8/2015 01:30 PM. Case Management Statement due by 12/1/2015. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 10/9/2015. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2015)
|
|
Filing
13
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 11 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Banyan Water, Inc., Water Steward, Inc. filed by Water Steward, Inc., Shannon Rund, Banyan Water, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 7/17/15. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
