Martin v. Saul
| Dawn Martin |
| Andrew Saul |
| 4:2020cv07754 |
| November 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Dawn Martin.. (Siegfried, Katherine) (Filed on 11/20/2020)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DIRECTING Plaintiff to file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by November 20, 2020. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2020)
|
|
Filing 7
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Andrew Saul.. (Kenney, Jennifer) (Filed on 11/12/2020)
|
|
Filing 6
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Dawn Martin. Service waived by Andrew Saul waiver sent on 11/10/2020, answer due 1/11/2021. Answer Due 2/08/2021 (Siegfried, Katherine) (Filed on 11/11/2020)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2020)
|
|
Filing 4
Proposed Summons. (Siegfried, Katherine) (Filed on 11/6/2020)
|
|
Filing 3
SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2020)
|
|
Filing 2
Case assigned to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2020)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-15148311.). Filed byDawn Martin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Siegfried, Katherine) (Filed on 11/3/2020) Modified on 11/4/2020 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 11/9/2020 (bnsS, COURT STAFF).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martin v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Ann Kenney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dawn Martin | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Rose Siegfried |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
