Yates v. Sonoma County et al
Plaintiff: Zachary Yates
Defendant: Sonoma County, Laura Consiglio, Brandon Bannister, DPO Chastain, Mark Essick and Legacy Long Distance International, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2023cv01812
Filed: April 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Referring Judge: Kandis A Westmore
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Proposed Order re #11 Notice of Motion and Motion by County Defendants to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Sonoma County. (Bruggisser, Petra) (Filed on 6/9/2023)
June 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE DOCKET NOS. #11 , #13 , AND #14 . In the future when filing a motion, please be sure that the supporting documents (declarations, exhibits, and proposed order) are e-filed as attachments to the motion filing and not e-filed as separate filings on the docket. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2023)
June 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Proposed Order re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Sonoma County. (Bruggisser, Petra) (Filed on 6/9/2023)
June 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Declaration of Petra Buggisser in Support of #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Sonoma County. (Related document(s) #11 ) (Bruggisser, Petra) (Filed on 6/9/2023) Modified on 6/9/2023 (anj, COURT STAFF).
June 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Request for Judicial Notice re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Sonoma County. (Related document(s) #11 ) (Bruggisser, Petra) (Filed on 6/9/2023) Modified on 6/9/2023 (anj, COURT STAFF).
June 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Notice of Motion and Motion by County Defendants to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Sonoma County. Motion Hearing set for 9/7/2023 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 6/23/2023. Replies due by 6/30/2023. (Bruggisser, Petra) (Filed on 6/9/2023) Modified on 6/9/2023 (anj, COURT STAFF).
June 9, 2023 Opinion or Order #Electronic filing error. Incorrect case number. Please re-file with the correct case number shown. Re: #14 Proposed Order filed by Sonoma County (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2023)
May 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE.Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for July 18, 2023, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m. Case Management Statement due by July 11th. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:23-cv-01812-HSG. The July 18th proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. NOTE REGARDING TELEPHONIC CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES: All attorneys and pro se litigants appearing for a telephonic case management conference are required to dial-in at least 15 minutes before the hearing to check-in with the CRD. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2023)
May 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case. Signed by Clerk on 05/01/2023. (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2023)
May 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 5/1/2023. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2023)
April 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ADMINISTRATIVE Motion to consider whether cases should be related and Proposed Order filed by Zachary Yates. Responses due by 5/1/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Stephen Kent Rose in Support of Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related, #2 Proposed Order Relating Cases and Transferring Later Filed Case)(Rose, Stephen) (Filed on 4/25/2023) Modified on 4/26/2023 (anj, COURT STAFF).
April 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Zachary Yates.. (Rose, Stephen) (Filed on 4/24/2023)
April 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/11/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/18/2023 01:30 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2023)
April 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Brandon Bannister, DPO Chastain, Laura Consiglio, Mark Essick, Legacy Long Distance International, Inc., Sonoma County. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2023)
April 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/28/2023. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2023)
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Rose, Stephen) (Filed on 4/13/2023)
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Damages with Jury Demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18171349.). Filed by Zachary Yates. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Rose, Stephen) (Filed on 4/13/2023) Modified on 4/14/2023 (anj, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yates v. Sonoma County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zachary Yates
Represented By: Stephen Kent Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sonoma County
Represented By: Petra Bruggisser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laura Consiglio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brandon Bannister
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DPO Chastain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Essick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Legacy Long Distance International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?