Olszewski et al v. Symyx Technologies, Inc. et al
| Robert Olszewski, Sara Bertsch, Jacqueline Macia, Philip McHale and Russell Blackadar |
| Symyx Technologies, Inc. and Elsevier, Inc. |
| 5:2008cv03657 |
| July 30, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| San Francisco |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER GRANTING 38 MOTION TO DISMISS by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2009)
|
|
Filing
43
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CMC re 42 Stipulation, filed by Symyx Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/4/2009. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2009)
|
|
Filing
37
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 36 Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Early Neutral Evaluation filed by Symyx Technologies, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/13/2009. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2009)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 Stipulation, filed by Symyx Technologies, Inc. Motion hearing continued to 06/02/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 05/11/2009. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2009)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 16 Stipulation, filed by Symyx Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/19/09. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
