Quality Technology Services, Holding, LLc v. Kock et al
| Quality Technology Services, Holding, LLc |
| Christian Kock, David Buciak, Tim Rhodes and Datapipe, Inc. |
| 5:2009cv05133 |
| October 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL re 61 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/17/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2010)
|
|
Filing
60
DISMISSAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 7/1/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2010)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER APPROVING 57 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE (1) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING DATE AND (2) TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS DATAPIPE, INC., DAVID BUCIAK, AND TIM RHODES TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. The Motion Hearing set for 6/11/2010 is CONTINUED to 7/23/2010 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 6/8/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2010)
|
|
Filing
50
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS re 47 , Case referred to mediation. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/12/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2010)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER APPROVING 43 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE (1) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND (2) TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS DATAPIPE, INC., DAVID BUCIAK, AND TIM RHODES TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. The Motion Hearing set for 4/16/2010 is CONTINUED to 6/11/2010 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/9/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2010)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER APPROVING 41 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE (1) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING DATE, (2) INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, AND (3) TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS DATAPIPE, INC., DAVID BUCIAK, AND TIM RHODES TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. The Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 3/5/2010 is CONTINUED to 4/16/2010 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. The Case Management Conference set for 3/12/2010 is CONTINUED to 4/23/2010 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 2/22/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2010)
|
|
Filing
40
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 39 Stipulation filed by Quality Technology Services, Holding, LLC. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on February 2, 2010. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2010)
|
|
Filing
38
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TIM RHODES TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT re 36 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/19/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2010)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/14/2010. (jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2010)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/30/2009. (jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2009)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION.Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/20/2009. (jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2009)
|
|
Filing
18
***DOCKETED IN ERROR, PLEASE DISREGARD***ORDER DENYING CONDITIONALLY PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF PENDING ARBITRATION. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/17/2009. (jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2009). Modified on 11/17/2009 (jflc3, COURT STAFF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
