Armstrong et al v. Chevy Chase Bank, FSB et al
| D. Stewart Armstrong and Cindy Ikeoka |
| Chevy Chase Bank, FSB, Capital One, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Service, Inc., TD Service Company, US Bank, N.A. and Quality Loan Servicing Corporation |
| 5:2011cv05664 |
| November 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE re 64 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Request for Dismissal without Prejudice filed by Cindy Ikeoka, D. Stewart Armstrong. The Clerk shall close this file. ***ALL Deadlines termi nated. Motions terminated: 64 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Request for Dismissal without Prejudice filed by Cindy Ikeoka, D. Stewart Armstrong, 62 MOTION to Set Aside Default filed by US Bank, N.A. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/3/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER granting 32 Motion to Dismiss. Since this order effectively resolves all causes of action against Capital One and Chevy Chase, they are DISMISSED as parties to this case. The court schedules a hearing on Plaintiffs anticipated motion for default judgment against U.S. Bank for 1/11/2013 9:00 a.m. Plaintiffs shall file and notice the motion accordingly. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/3/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2012)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER Granting 39 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice as to TD Service Company ONLY filed by Cindy Ikeoka, D. Stewart Armstrong. TD Service Company terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/22/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2012)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Based on the parties' Joint Case Management Statement, the court finds that a Case Management Conference would be premature at this time. The parties shall contact the court's ADR Unit within 10 days of the date of this Order. Joint Case Management Statement due by 6/5/2012. Case Management Conference set for 6/15/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. The Motion for telephonic appearance is found as MOOT. Motions terminated: 37 MOTION to Appear by Telephone at Case Management Conference filed by Cindy Ikeoka, D. Stewart Armstrong. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/21/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2012)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER GRANTING 31 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Quality Loan Servicing Corporation Without Prejudice. Quality Loan Servicing Corporation terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/7/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2012)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER GRANTING 29 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Quality Loan Servicing Corporation. Attorney Deborah Suzanne Cochran for Quality Loan Servicing Corporation added. Attorney Renee Reyes De Golier terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/2/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2012)
|
|
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Extension of Briefing Schedule on Motion to Dismiss re 18 STIPULATION. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss. Response due by 2/6/2012. Reply due by 2/13/2012. The hearing date remains unchanged. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/24/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
