Goldstein v. Colvin
Steven M. Goldstein |
Carolyn W. Colvin |
5:2013cv03504 |
July 30, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 100 ORDER DISMISSING MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AS MOOT by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers; denying 99 Motion for New Trial. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2018) |
Filing 97 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd re 84 , 90 , 91 , 92 denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granting defendant's motion for summary judgment. (hrllc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2018) |
Filing 71 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd re 67 68 69 Motion for Writ of Mandamus. Status Conference set for 3/21/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2017) |
Filing 65 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying 56 , 57 , 58 plaintiff's Motions for Reconsideration; denying as moot 62 plaintiff's Motion to Intervene; denying as moot 64 defendant's Motion to Appear by Telephone. 12/8/2015 hearing vacated. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2015) |
Filing 55 ORDER by Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying 50 plaintiff's Motion to Set Aside Judgment; finding as moot 52 defendant's Motion to Appear by Telephone. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2015) |
Filing 49 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying 46 , 47 Motion and Revised Motion for Reversal; finding as moot 48 Motion to Appear by Telephone. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2015) |
Filing 45 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Amend Remand Order; denying 40 Motion for Interim Benefits; denying as moot 44 Motion to Appear by Telephone. 4/21/2015 hearing vacated. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2015) |
Filing 38 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying 35 plaintiff's "Motion to Quash Closure of Case and Remand Order"; denying 36 plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2015) |
Filing 34 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 23 defendant's motion to remand; denying 25 , 31 plaintiff's motions for reversal order and judgment. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2015) |
Filing 13 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying 7 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 9 , 10 Motions for Reversal Order. Plaintiff given until 5/30/2014 to properly effect service. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Goldstein v. Colvin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Steven M. Goldstein | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.