Jimenez et al v. Suntrust Mortgage Inc.
| Margarito Jimenez and Efren Jimenez |
| Suntrust Mortgage Inc. |
| 5:2013cv04615 |
| October 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER granting 20 Motion for Attorney Fees signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on August 11, 2014. (ejdlc4S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2014)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This case is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant and the Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/11/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2014)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. If Plaintiffs do not, by 2/10/2014, file a Case Management Conference Statement or otherwise demonstrate good cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court. In light of this order, the Case Management Conference scheduled for 2/7/2014, is VACATED and will be reset by the court if necessary. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/4/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
