Smith v. Pasley et al
| Jerry Eugene Smith |
| T. Pasley and Alex Lile |
| 5:2014cv01779 |
| April 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Alameda |
| Edward J. Davila |
| PSLC HHL |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION re 25 Declaration in Support filed by Jerry Eugene Smith. Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting an extension of time of 28 days to file an opposition. (Docket No. 25.) Good cause being shown, Plaintiff's request is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an opposition no later than April 28, 2015. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/27/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2015)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER OF SERVICE; DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR NOTICE REGARDING SUCH MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 10/6/2014. The Clerk of the Court shall mail a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons, two copies of the Waiver of Service of Summons, a copy of the complaint, all attachments thereto, and a copy of this order upon Defendants T. Pasley, Office Assistant, and Alex Lile, Mail Room Supervisor, at San Quentin State Prison, (San Quentin, CA 94964). The Clerk shall also mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/5/2014.(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
