Abate v. Delta Air Lines Inc

Abate v. Delta Air Lines Inc

Plaintiff:	Solomon Abate
Defendant:	Delta Air Lines Inc
Case Number:	5:2014cv03600
Filed:	August 8, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office:	San Jose Office
County:	Santa Clara
Presiding Judge:	Edward J. Davila
Presiding Judge:	Paul Singh Grewal
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 5, 2015	Filing 49 ORDER granting 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/5/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2015)
January 20, 2015	Filing 19 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Accordingly, the court hereby issues an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with a court order. If Plaintiff does not, by January 30, 2015, file a Case Management Conference Statement which conforms to the undersigned's Standing Order or otherwise demonstrate good cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court. In light of this order, the Case Management Conference scheduled for January 22, 2015, is VACATED and will be reset if necessary upon resolution of the issue addressed herein. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/20/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2015)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 5, 2015

Filing 49 ORDER granting 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/5/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2015)

January 20, 2015

Filing 19 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Accordingly, the court hereby issues an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with a court order. If Plaintiff does not, by January 30, 2015, file a Case Management Conference Statement which conforms to the undersigned's Standing Order or otherwise demonstrate good cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court. In light of this order, the Case Management Conference scheduled for January 22, 2015, is VACATED and will be reset if necessary upon resolution of the issue addressed herein. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/20/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2015)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abate v. Delta Air Lines Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Delta Air Lines Inc
Represented By:	Marc L. Jacuzzi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Solomon Abate
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?