Smith v. Lile
| Jerry Smith |
| Jerry White and Alex Lile |
| 5:2014cv04648 |
| October 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Alameda |
| Edward J. Davila |
| PSLC HHL |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING 25 MOTION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION. Having shown good cause, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an opposition no later than 10/21/2015. Defendants shall file a reply within fourteen (14) days after the filing date of Plaintiff's opposition. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/18/2015. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/18/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2015)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER OF SERVICE. The Clerk of the Court shall mail a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons, two copies of the Waiver of Service of Summons, a copy of the second amended complaint (Docket No. 8), all attachments thereto, and a copy of this order upon Defendant Alex Lile at San Quentin State Prison, (San Quentin, CA 94964). The Clerk shall also mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 7/27/2015. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/28/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
