Devesa Villanueva v. United States of America et al
Arturo Devesa Villanueva |
The United States of America, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Jeh Johnson, Leon Rodriguez, Donald Neufeld and John Kramar |
5:2014cv04976 |
November 10, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. If attorney Placide does not, by 7/25/2016, file or cause to be filed adequate proof confirming attorney Placide's pro hac vice admission or pending admission, the court will determine an appropriate sanction under Civil Local Rule 11-8 and will order the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal stricken. No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/20/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2016) |
Filing 12 ORDER for Reassignment to a District Judge; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute. Objections due by 8/2/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/19/2016. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2016) |
Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Show Cause Response due by 7/15/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/5/2016. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.