Xoriant Corporation v. United States of America
| Xoriant Corporation |
| United States of America |
| 5:2014mc80115 |
| April 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Alameda |
| Edward J Davila |
| Howard R Lloyd |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. The hearings scheduled for 10/31/2014 are VACATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/28/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2014)
|
| Filing 7 CLERKS NOTICE Continuing Motion Hearing. Set/Reset Deadlines as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . Motion Hearing set for 10/31/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. This is a text only docket entry, there is no document associated with this notice. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2014) |
| Filing 6 REPLY (re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ) filed byUnited States of America. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Pitman, Michael) (Filed on 7/10/2014) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE (re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ) Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Petitioner's Petition to Quash Summons filed byXoriant Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mahesh Nalavade, #2 Exhibit A to Mahesh Nalavade Declaration, #3 Declaration of Tyler Shewey)(Picone, Christian) (Filed on 7/7/2014) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by United States of America. Motion Hearing set for 8/5/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Responses due by 7/7/2014. Replies due by 7/14/2014. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Pitman, Michael) (Filed on 6/23/2014) |
| Filing 3 Declaration of T. Shewey in Support of #1 MOTION to Quash filed byXoriant Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Related document(s) #1 ) (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2014) |
| Filing 2 Declaration of M. Nalavade in Support of #1 MOTION to Quash filed byXoriant Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Summons)(Related document(s) #1 ) (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2014) |
| Filing 1 PETITION to Quash Summons filed by Xoriant Corporation. Responses due by 5/12/2014. Replies due by 5/19/2014. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2014) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Xoriant Corporation v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Xoriant Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Christian E. Picone |
| Represented By: | Sara Louise Pollock |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Michael G. Pitman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
