Giotta et al v. Ocwen Financial Corporation et al
| Victor P Giotta and Loralee Giotta |
| Ocwen Financial Corporation, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A., Altisource Solutions, Inc. and William C Erbey |
| 5:2015cv00620 |
| February 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Beth Labson Freeman |
| Paul Singh Grewal |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER GRANTING 84 DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND; AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/24/2016.(blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2016)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER APPROVING 97 STIPULATION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/27/2016. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2016)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER GRANTING 86 WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 3/24/2016. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2016)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER APPROVING 82 THIRD STIPULATION TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AS TO MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Motion due by 2/29/2016. Response due by 4/8/2016. Reply due by 4/28/2016. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/11/2016. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2016)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER GRANTING 79 REQUEST TO FILE CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO DISMISS; AND DENYING 79 REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/3/2016. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2016)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER APPROVING 76 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE, AND FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/29/2015. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2015)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER (1) DENYING 53 DEFENDANT ERBEY'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION; (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 53 DEFENDANT ERBEY'S ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM; (3) GRANTING IN PAR T AND DENYING IN PART 52 OCWEN DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM; AND (4) GRANTING 54 DEFENDANT ALTISOURCE'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. Amended Pleading due by 1/15/2016. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2015)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT, MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE, AND FOR RELIEF FROM STIPULATED ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES. Motions terminated: 39 MOTION to Dismiss filed by William C Erbey, 49 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Amended Complaint filed by William C Erbey, Ocwen Financial Corporation, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, 38 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ocwen Financial Corporation, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, 40 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/15/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2015)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER APPROVING 35 STIPULATION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES. Case Management Statement due by 8/20/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/27/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
