Diaz et al v. Premium Packing, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mario Ivan Espinoza Diaz and Guillermo Cruz Cruz
Defendant: Premium Packing, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2015cv01258
Filed: March 18, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Monterey
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M. Cousins
Presiding Judge: Edward J. Davila
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER VACATING EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND RELATED DEADLINES. In light of the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 64 , the evidentiary hearing scheduled for August 17th and August 19, 2016, and all related deadlines, are VACATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on July 6, 2016. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2016)
February 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER RE: DISCOVERY IN ANTICIPATION OF EVIDENTIARY HEARING re 56 Letter filed by Premium Packing, Inc., 55 Letter filed by Guillermo Cruz Cruz, Mario Ivan Espinoza Diaz. Given the parties' agreement to create a discovery plan in antici pation of the evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether there exists an arbitration agreement between Plaintiffs and Defendant, the court orders that any disputes with respect to such discovery - save for any disagreement on what discovery should be permitted - are referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/24/2016.(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2016)
January 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 1/21/2016. All scheduling issues will be addressed on 1/28/2016. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/8/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2016)
January 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER denying without prejudice 20 , 21 Motions to Compel Arbitration; denying without prejudice 27 Motion for Sanctions; denying without prejudice 30 Motion to Submit Supplemental Evidence. The court schedules a Case Management Confere nce for 10:00 a.m. on 1/28/2016 in order to discuss the evidentiary hearing. On or before 1/21/2016, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/6/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2016)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diaz et al v. Premium Packing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mario Ivan Espinoza Diaz
Represented By: Santos Gomez
Represented By: Gregory N. Karasik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Guillermo Cruz Cruz
Represented By: Santos Gomez
Represented By: Gregory N. Karasik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Premium Packing, Inc.
Represented By: Michael Christopher Saqui
Represented By: Kimberley Ann Worley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?