Sullivan v. Muniz
Defendant: William Muniz
Petitioner: Carl Otis Sullivan
Case Number: 3:2017cv05174
Filed: September 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Denying Defendant's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28 U.S.C. 2254). Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on October 18, 2019. The Clerk shall close the file. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2019)
November 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/15/2017. (hrllc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2017)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sullivan v. Muniz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Carl Otis Sullivan
Represented By: John Doyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Muniz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?