Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Xilinx, Inc.
Plaintiff: Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
Defendant: Xilinx, Inc.
Movant: UMC Group (USA)
Case Number: 5:2017mc80116
Filed: September 11, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Susan van Keulen
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Xilinx, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
Represented By: Christopher L. Evans
Represented By: Valerie Margo Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Xilinx, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: UMC Group (USA)
Represented By: Jodi Lynn Benassi
Represented By: Daniel Raymond Foster, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?