Jin v. Saul
Plaintiff: Kang Jin
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 5:2021cv00379
Filed: January 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M Cousins
Referring Judge: Beth Labson Freeman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary A Gilg (Gilg, Mary) (Filed on 3/5/2021)
March 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Andrew M. Saul.. (Naicker, Tina) (Filed on 3/3/2021)
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Acknowledgment of Receipt from U.S. Attorney re: #12 Waiver of Service. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2021)
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Waiver of Service sent to Social Security and U.S. Department of Justice at the following addresses: Jill.Brinton@ssa.gov SF.OGC.SC@ssa.gov and KTerry@usa.doj.gov OCARMINATI@usa.doj.gov (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2021)
February 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING #7 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/17/2021. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2021)
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Beth Labson Freeman for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 2/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2021)
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2021)
February 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Kang Jin.. (Homer, Daniel) (Filed on 2/14/2021)
February 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kang Jin. (Homer, Daniel) (Filed on 2/14/2021)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE RE: Consent or Declination. All parties are requested to file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 2/23/2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2021)
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2021)
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/29/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2021)
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time to File Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2021)
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Proposed Order filed by Kang Jin. (Homer, Daniel) (Filed on 1/14/2021)
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul. Filed byKang Jin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Homer, Daniel) (Filed on 1/14/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jin v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kang Jin
Represented By: Daniel Leo Homer
Represented By: Mary A. Gilg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Tina Laxmi Naicker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?