Western Watersheds Project v. BLM

Petitioner - Appellant: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Respondent - Appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor - Appellee: LHS SPLIT ROCK RANCH, LLC.
Case Number: 12-8012
Filed: February 14, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
July 23, 2013 Summary Western Watersheds Project v. BLM

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 23, 2013 1019096315 Opinion or Order of the Court [10093437] Affirmed;Terminated on the merits after oral hearing;Written, signed, published; Judges Lucero, Hartz and Matheson (authoring). Mandate to issue. [12-8012]
Search for this case: Western Watersheds Project v. BLM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Represented By: Gay George
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Represented By: Christopher Levi Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor - appellee: LHS SPLIT ROCK RANCH, LLC.
Represented By: Karen Budd-Falen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.