Michael Ramjeawan, et al v. BAC

Defendant - Appellant: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL RAMJEAWAN and RITIE B. RAMJEAWAN
Case Number: 11-11419
Filed: March 31, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
July 11, 2012 Michael Ramjeawan, et al v. Bank of America

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 11, 2012 1116613752 Opinion or Order of the Court Opinion issued by court as to Appellant BAC. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam.
Search for this case: Michael Ramjeawan, et al v. BAC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Represented By: J. Randolph Liebler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: MICHAEL RAMJEAWAN
Represented By: Sean Michael Cleary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: RITIE B. RAMJEAWAN
Represented By: Sean Michael Cleary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.