Denise Schippers, et al v. USA

Plaintiff - Appellant: DENISE SCHIPPERS and SHARON COX-ESTEP
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 12-10023
Filed: January 4, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Airplane Personal Injury

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
May 3, 2013 Summary Schippers, et al v. United States

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 3, 2013 1116991157 Opinion or Order of the Court Opinion issued by court as to Appellants Sharon Cox-Estep and Denise Schippers. Decision: Reversed and Remanded. Opinion type: Published. Opinion method: Signed.
Search for this case: Denise Schippers, et al v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: DENISE SCHIPPERS
Represented By: Charles W. Branham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: SHARON COX-ESTEP
Represented By: Charles W. Branham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Jeffrica Jenkins Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.