Ronnie Spivey v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., et al

Plaintiff - Appellant: RONNIE SPIVEY
Defendant - Appellee: FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, SCRUGGS COMPANY, The and W.G. YATES & SONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Case Number: 12-11869
Filed: April 9, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage

Search for this case: Ronnie Spivey v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: RONNIE SPIVEY
Represented By: Brent J. Savage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND
Represented By: Philip Keith Lichtman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: SCRUGGS COMPANY, The
Represented By: Philip Keith Lichtman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: W.G. YATES & SONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Represented By: Philip Keith Lichtman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.