David Wood, et al v. Unified Government of Athens-C
| DAVID A. WOOD, on behalf of hinself and all persons similarly situated, NANCY COCHRAN, on behalf of herself and all person similarly situated, BOBBY SNIPES, on behalf of himself and all persons similarly situated and WENDELL FAULKNER, on behalf of himself and all person similarly situated |
| UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA |
| 15-11707 |
| April 23, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Wood v. Unified Gov't of Athens-Clarke Cnty.
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: David Wood, et al v. Unified Government of Athens-C | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: DAVID A. WOOD, on behalf of hinself and all persons similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Caplan |
| Represented By: | James William Cobb |
| Represented By: | Jeffery Spence Johnson |
| Represented By: | Dustin Marlowe |
| Represented By: | Timothy Brandon Waddell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: NANCY COCHRAN, on behalf of herself and all person similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Caplan |
| Represented By: | James William Cobb |
| Represented By: | Jeffery Spence Johnson |
| Represented By: | Dustin Marlowe |
| Represented By: | Timothy Brandon Waddell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: BOBBY SNIPES, on behalf of himself and all persons similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Caplan |
| Represented By: | James William Cobb |
| Represented By: | Jeffery Spence Johnson |
| Represented By: | Dustin Marlowe |
| Represented By: | Timothy Brandon Waddell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: WENDELL FAULKNER, on behalf of himself and all person similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Caplan |
| Represented By: | James William Cobb |
| Represented By: | Jeffery Spence Johnson |
| Represented By: | Dustin Marlowe |
| Represented By: | Timothy Brandon Waddell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA | |
| Represented By: | Richard Read Gignilliat |
| Represented By: | Patrick Lail |
| Represented By: | Andrew H. Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
