Prescott v. Holder

Petitioner - Appellant: Kevin Dwight Prescott, AKA Kevin Johnson
Respondent - Appellee: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General, Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ICE
Case Number: 11-587
Filed: February 15, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: -Other Immigration Actions

Search for this case: Prescott v. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: Kevin Dwight Prescott, AKA Kevin Johnson
Represented By: Kevin Dwight Prescott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Represented By: Varuni Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: Varuni Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ICE
Represented By: Varuni Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.