Technomarine SA v. Giftports, Inc.

Plaintiff - Appellant: Technomarine SA
Defendant: Does 1 Through 10
Defendant - Appellee: Giftports, Inc., a New York Corporation
Case Number: 12-4174
Filed: October 18, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: PROPERTY RIGHTS-Trademark

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
July 15, 2014 Summary Technomarine SA v. Giftports, Inc.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 15, 2014 203351500 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION, affirming judgment of the district court, by DAL, RJL, S.H. STEIN, FILED.[1270924] [12-4174]
Search for this case: Technomarine SA v. Giftports, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Technomarine SA
Represented By: Brent Herbert Blakely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 Through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Giftports, Inc., a New York Corporation
Represented By: William Jay Thomashower
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.