Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee v. Shumlin
Plaintiff - Appellee: Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: Peter Shumlin, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Vermont, William Sorrell, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Vermont, James Volz, in his official capacity as a member of the Vermont Public Service Board, John Burke, in his official capacity as a member of the Vermont Public Service Board and David Coen, in his official capacity as a member of the Vermont Public Service Board
Case Number: 12-707
Filed: February 24, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: LOCAL QUESTION-Constitutional

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 14, 2013 Summary Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee v. Shumlin

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee v. Shumlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC
Represented By: Robert B. Hemley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Represented By: Robert B. Hemley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: Peter Shumlin, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Vermont
Represented By: Scot L. Kline
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: William Sorrell, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Vermont
Represented By: Scot L. Kline
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: James Volz, in his official capacity as a member of the Vermont Public Service Board
Represented By: Scot L. Kline
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: John Burke, in his official capacity as a member of the Vermont Public Service Board
Represented By: Scot L. Kline
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: David Coen, in his official capacity as a member of the Vermont Public Service Board
Represented By: Scot L. Kline
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?