McCarthy v. Pfizer, Inc.
Ana McCarthy |
Pfizer, Inc. |
23-156 |
January 31, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
CONTRACT-Other Contract Action |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MOTION, to dismiss, on behalf of Appellee Pfizer, Inc., FILED. Service date 03/07/2023 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3479577] [23-156] [Entered: 03/07/2023 04:24 PM] |
Filing 16 ATTORNEY, Tatiana R. Martins for Pfizer, Inc., in case 23-156, [ # 15 ], ADDED.[3479570] [23-156] [Entered: 03/07/2023 04:21 PM] |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Pfizer, Inc., FILED. Service date 03/07/2023 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3479566] [23-156] [Entered: 03/07/2023 04:19 PM] |
Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Pfizer, Inc., FILED. Service date 03/07/2023 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3479564] [23-156] [Entered: 03/07/2023 04:15 PM] |
Filing 12 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Ana McCarthy, district court receipt # 13359, FILED.[3479529] [23-156] [Entered: 03/07/2023 03:50 PM] |
Filing 11 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Lara Samet Buchwald, Esq. for Appellee Pfizer, Inc., orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[3479381] [23-156] [Entered: 03/07/2023 02:11 PM] |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Lara Samet Buchwald for Pfizer, Inc., in case 23-156, [ # 9 ], ADDED.[3479379] [23-156] [Entered: 03/07/2023 02:11 PM] |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Pfizer, Inc., FILED. Service date 03/07/2023 by CM/ECF. [3479353] [23-156] [Entered: 03/07/2023 01:54 PM] |
Filing 8 ORDER, dated 03/07/2023, dismissing appeal by 03/28/2023, unless Appellant Ana McCarthy, submits fee or moves to proceed in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3479279] [23-156] [Entered: 03/07/2023 12:35 PM] |
Filing 7 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Ana McCarthy, FILED. Service date 02/08/2023 by hand delivery.[3466147] [23-156] [Entered: 02/08/2023 05:04 PM] |
Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Ana McCarthy, FILED. Service date 02/08/2023 by hand delivery.[3466145] [23-156] [Entered: 02/08/2023 05:03 PM] |
Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3464070] [23-156] [Entered: 02/03/2023 06:53 PM] |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3464069] [23-156] [Entered: 02/03/2023 06:51 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL, dated 11/14/2022, RECEIVED.[3464068] [23-156] [Entered: 02/03/2023 06:50 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Ana McCarthy, FILED. [3464067] [23-156] [Entered: 02/03/2023 06:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: McCarthy v. Pfizer, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Ana McCarthy | |
Represented By: | Ana McCarthy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Pfizer, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Tatiana R. Martins |
Represented By: | Lara Samet Buchwald Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.