Arlene Grudkowski v. Foremost Insurance Co

Plaintiff - Appellant: ARLENE GRUDKOWSKI, Individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons
Defendant - Appellee: FOREMOST INSURANCE CO
Case Number: 13-1893
Filed: April 8, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Insurance

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
February 27, 2014 Arlene Grudkowski v. Foremost Insurance Co

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 27, 2014 3011545040 Opinion or Order of the Court NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: CHAGARES, SHWARTZ and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 10. Judge: SHWARTZ Authoring. Because Pennsylvania law dictates that outcome here, appellant's motion for certification to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is denied.--[Edited 02/27/2014 by MGD]
Search for this case: Arlene Grudkowski v. Foremost Insurance Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: ARLENE GRUDKOWSKI, Individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons
Represented By: Thomas J. Campenni
Represented By: James C. Haggerty
Represented By: Richard A. Russo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: FOREMOST INSURANCE CO
Represented By: Patrick R. Casey
Represented By: John G. Dean
Represented By: Joseph Kernen
Represented By: Brian M. Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.