James Schwartz v. OneWest Bank FSB
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES E. SCHWARTZ
Defendant - Appellee: ONEWEST BANK FSB
Case Number: 13-4680
Filed: December 13, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Real Property Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 5, 2015 James Schwartz v. OneWest Bank FSB

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3011982434 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: FISHER, JORDAN and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 7. Judge: SHWARTZ Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: James Schwartz v. OneWest Bank FSB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JAMES E. SCHWARTZ
Represented By: H. Peter Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: ONEWEST BANK FSB
Represented By: Arthur R. Armstrong
Represented By: Martin C. Bryce
Represented By: Daniel McKenna
Represented By: Brett L. Messinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?