Michael Rupert v. Ford Motor Co
| MICHAEL T. RUPERT |
| JACQUELINE C. RUPERT |
| FORD MOTOR CO |
| STEVEN B. MACON and BRAYMAN CONSTRUCTION CORP |
| 14-1006 |
| January 8, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER (RENDELL, FISHER and GREENAWAY JR., Circuit Judges) dismissing appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Appellee Michael Rupert's motion for sanctions is denied, filed. Panel No.: ACO-048. (TMK) [Entered: 02/18/2014 12:15 PM]
|
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Joshua A. Lyons on behalf of Appellant(s) Jacqueline C. Rupert. (JAL) [Entered: 01/31/2014 10:55 AM] |
| ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellees Brayman Construction Corp and Steven B. Macon to clerk order advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 01/22/2014. (MFN) [Entered: 01/23/2014 10:09 AM] |
| ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Jacqueline Rupert, filed. (DMN) [Entered: 01/22/2014 04:15 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Michael F. Nerone, Esquire on behalf of Appellee(s) Steven B. Macon and Brayman Construction Corporation. (MFN) [Entered: 01/22/2014 02:19 PM] |
| ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Jacqueline Rupert, filed. (DMN) [Entered: 01/22/2014 04:17 PM] |
| ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellant Jacqueline Rupert to clerk order advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 01/22/2014. (DMN) [Entered: 01/22/2014 05:10 PM] |
| ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Ford Motor Co, filed. (NRW) [Entered: 01/22/2014 10:22 AM] |
| ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Jacqueline Rupert advising this court that no transcripts are available. (DMN) [Entered: 01/22/2014 04:19 PM] |
| ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Jacqueline Rupert, received. (DMN) [Entered: 01/22/2014 04:18 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Douglas George Linn, II on behalf of Appellee(s) Michael Rupert. (DGL) [Entered: 01/20/2014 11:12 AM] |
| ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Ford Motor Co to clerk order advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 01/17/2014. (NRW) [Entered: 01/17/2014 09:26 AM] |
| ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellant Jacqueline Rupert to Motion for sanctions for filing a frivolous appeal (F.R.A.P. 38). Certificate of Service dated 01/17/2014. (DMN) [Entered: 01/17/2014 11:07 AM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Nancy R. Winschel on behalf of Appellee(s) Ford Motor Co. (NRW) [Entered: 01/17/2014 09:19 AM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from David M. Nernberg on behalf of Appellant(s) Jacqueline C. Rupert. (DMN) [Entered: 01/16/2014 03:07 PM] |
| ECF FILER: CORRECTED Response filed by Appellee Michael T. Rupert to Response. Certificate of Service dated 01/14/2014. (DGL) [Entered: 01/14/2014 11:36 AM] |
| ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Michael T. Rupert to clerk order advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 01/14/2014. (DGL) [Entered: 01/14/2014 10:40 AM] |
| ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellee Michael T. Rupert Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 38 for Sanctions Against Appellant. Certificate of Service dated 01/09/2014.--[Edited 01/09/2014 by TMK] (DGL) [Entered: 01/09/2014 09:49 AM] |
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMK) [Entered: 01/08/2014 11:51 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect, filed. (TMK) [Entered: 01/08/2014 11:53 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Jacqueline C. Rupert in District Court No. 2-12-cv-00331. (TMK) [Entered: 01/08/2014 11:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
