Lynn Christian v. Honeywell Retirement Benefit P
Plaintiff - Appellant: LYNN K. CHRISTIAN
Defendant - Appellee: HONEYWELL RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN
Case Number: 14-1084
Filed: January 14, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 12, 2014 Lynn Christian v. Honeywell Retirement Benefit P

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3011790808 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: RENDELL, GREENAWAY JR. and SLOVITER, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 5. Judge: GREENAWAY JR. Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lynn Christian v. Honeywell Retirement Benefit P
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: LYNN K. CHRISTIAN
Represented By: Julie A. Uebler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: HONEYWELL RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN
Represented By: Joseph E. Clark
Represented By: Amy R. Covert
Represented By: Bruce S. Marks
Represented By: Thomas C. Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?