David DiStefano v. Macys Retail Holdings Inc
| DAVID DISTEFANO |
| MACYS RETAIL HOLDINGS INC |
| 14-2078 |
| May 1, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Personal Injury |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| David DiStefano v. Macys Retail Holdings Inc |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3012057390
NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: FISHER, SHWARTZ and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 9. DLD-302. Accordingly, because this appeal does not raise a substantial question, we will summarily affirm the judgment of the District Court. Appellant's request for oral argument is denied.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: David DiStefano v. Macys Retail Holdings Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: DAVID DISTEFANO | |
| Represented By: | David DiStefano |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: MACYS RETAIL HOLDINGS INC | |
| Represented By: | Anthony W. Hinkle |
| Represented By: | Katherine Robinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
