USA v. Robert Whitfield
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| ROBERT LAMAR WHITFIELD, aka LAMAR WHITFIELD aka GOAT |
| 14-3345 |
| July 22, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| USA v. Robert Whitfield |
| USA v. Robert Whitfield |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3012284017
NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: MCKEE, Chief Judge, SMITH and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 15. Judge: SMITH Authoring.--[Edited 05/05/2016 by JK]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Robert Whitfield | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Jeanine Linehan |
| Represented By: | Virginia P. Pratter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: ROBERT LAMAR WHITFIELD, aka LAMAR WHITFIELD aka GOAT | |
| Represented By: | J. Michael Farrell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
