Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction Corp
Plaintiff - Appellant: SANDRA CONNELLY
Defendant - Appellee: LANE CONSTRUCTION CORP
Case Number: 14-3792
Filed: September 4, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 11, 2016 Summary Connelly v. Lane Constr. Corp

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3012175271 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: FISHER, CHAGARES and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 24. Judge: CHAGARES Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction Corp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: SANDRA CONNELLY
Represented By: John E. Stember
Represented By: Emily E. Town
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: LANE CONSTRUCTION CORP
Represented By: Samantha M. Clancy
Represented By: Maria G. Danaher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?