Daniel Polhill v. FedEx Ground Package System
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL C. POLHILL
Defendant - Appellee: FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM
Case Number: 14-4015
Filed: September 29, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury-Product Liability

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 9, 2015 Daniel Polhill v. FedEx Ground Package System

RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3011897931 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: RENDELL, GREENAWAY JR. and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 7.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Daniel Polhill v. FedEx Ground Package System
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: DANIEL C. POLHILL
Represented By: Daniel C. Polhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM
Represented By: James R. Callan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?