Raymond Chestnut v. Warden Lewisburg USP
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Case Number: 14-4773
Filed: December 23, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 2, 2015 Raymond Chestnut v. Warden Lewisburg USP

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3012007596 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: RENDELL, CHAGARES and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 5. ALD-245
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Raymond Chestnut v. Warden Lewisburg USP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT
Represented By: Raymond Edward Chestnut
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Represented By: Mark E. Morrison
Represented By: G. Michael Thiel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?