Catherine Beckwith v. Penn State University
Plaintiff - Appellant: CATHERINE BECKWITH
Defendant - Appellee: PENN STATE UNIVERSITY, DBA Penn State College of Medicine
Case Number: 15-1392
Filed: February 13, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 30, 2016 Catherine Beckwith v. Penn State University

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3012475417 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: JORDAN, GREENAWAY JR. and RENDELL, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 8. Judge: RENDELL Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Catherine Beckwith v. Penn State University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: CATHERINE BECKWITH
Represented By: Gregory E. Monskie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: PENN STATE UNIVERSITY, DBA Penn State College of Medicine
Represented By: Nancy Conrad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?