Michelle Mammaro v. DCP&P, et al
| MICHELLE MAMMARO |
| NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, formerly known as DIVISION OF YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES, KARA P. WOOD, in her official capacity as Director of DCP&P, ALLISON BLAKE, in her official capacity as the Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families, ALIREICHEN GRAZIANI, in her individual capacity, BENJAMIN REHIG, in his individual capacity, REBECCA LABARRE, in her individual capacity and KRISTA DEBROUX, in her individual capacity |
| WATCHUNG POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSEPH R. CINA, in his official capacity as Acting Chief of Police of the Watchung Police Department, SUAN HACKER, in her individual capacity, OMEGA LABOATORY INC, ANDREW HART, in his individual capacity, SCOTT TALLMADGE, in his individual capacity and PATRICK MINNO |
| 15-1448 |
| February 24, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Mammaro v. N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency
|
|
Michelle Mammaro v. DCP&P
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3012238314
ORDER AMENDING OPINION (Coram: MCKEE, Chief Judges, AMBRO and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges) IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion filed February 19, 2016, be amended as follows: On page 6, first full paragraph, line 8, delete the phrase "notifying and Division representative" and replace it with "Division approval" so that the sentence reads: "Without Division approval, Mammaro then moved with D.M. to a private home." Ambro, Authoring Judge.
|
|
Filing
3012211448
PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: MCKEE, Chief Judge, AMBRO and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 13. Judge: AMBRO Authoring.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
