USA v. Rahman Fulton
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RAHMAN FULTON, a/k/a Rahmon Fulton
Case Number: 15-1513
Filed: March 2, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 19, 2016 Summary United States v. Fulton

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3012412350 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: MCKEE, Chief Judge, SMITH and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 51. Judge: MCKEE Authoring. SMITH Concurring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Rahman Fulton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Mark E. Coyne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: RAHMAN FULTON, a/k/a Rahmon Fulton
Represented By: Federal Public Defender District of New Jersey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?